Pop those bottles,Russia First Amendment-lovers. Plaintiffs in a freedom of speech lawsuit just scored a major victory against President Trump in court.
A New York District Court judge has ruled that President Donald Trump may not block people on Twitter for criticizing or disagreeing with him.
SEE ALSO: 12 important things you probably missed while Trump was tweetingThe ruling is the result of a lawsuit, filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, on behalf of seven plaintiffs that Trump blocked on Twitter.
“We’re pleased with the court’s decision, which reflects a careful application of core First Amendment principles to government censorship on a new communications platform,” the Knight Institute’s executive director, Jameel Jaffer, said in a statement. “The president’s practice of blocking critics on Twitter is pernicious and unconstitutional, and we hope this ruling will bring it to an end.”
The suit alleged that when @RealDonaldTrump blocked the plaintiffs in the case after they criticized Trump on Twitter, it constituted "viewpoint discrimination," which is a violation of their First Amendment rights to free speech in a public forum.
United States District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald first of all decided that yes, Twitter does constitute a public forum. Since it is a public forum, individuals' freedom of speech can't be limited there on the basis of political viewpoint.
Crucially, she found that President Trump's stature as the, um, President, did not qualify for any sort of exemption. Wrote Reice Buchwald:
This case requires us to consider whether a public official may, consistent with the First Amendment, “block” a person from his Twitter account in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public official is the President of the United States. The answer to both questions is no.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The ruling is significant because it shows that if a public official uses Twitter in an official capacity, that can qualify it as a public forum -- where freedom of speech is protected. Or, as the Electronic Frontier Foundation explained on Twitter in December 2017, "whether through an official or personal account, if a platform is being used to conduct the government’s business, the account is subject to the First Amendment." This lawsuit puts that legal precedent on the books.
"Technology has changed how we communicate," Alberto Ibargüen, Knight Foundation president, told Mashable via email. "This is one of the first cases to interpret how the First Amendment will be applied to Internet. Many, many more will follow.”
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The case also demonstrates the principle that all people are equally beholden to the rule of law -- even the President.
"A declaratory judgment should be sufficient, as no government official -- including the President -- is above the law, and all government officials are presumed to follow the law as has been declared," wrote Justice Reice Buchwald in her decision.
Hmm, it seems like the Justice hasn't met our president yet.
Topics X/Twitter Donald Trump Politics
Djordje Ozbolt’s “More Paintings About Poets and Food”“Mating” Book Club, Part 2: Of Tits and NubsThere’s an Erotic Animated Don Quixote, and It’s TerrifyingAvoid This Book: The History and Romance of Elastic WebbingJohn Jeremiah Sullivan Wins Windham Campbell PrizeApply to Be The Paris Review‘s Next WriterStaff Picks: Walser, Verhoeven, Lead Belly, and MoreTim Kirkland, a Piano Tuner, Finds Religion in His WorkAvoid This Book: The History and Romance of Elastic WebbingHow a Tchotchke Became a Family Heirloom, of SortsSolitude Is the Hardest Thing to FindThe Nervous Systems of BooksSeeing the World Through Broken GlassesPeter Gizzi on Poetry and NothingnessThere’s an Erotic Animated Don Quixote, and It’s TerrifyingHow the State Department Kept Faulkner’s Drinking in CheckMarch 21 Is World Puppetry DayWhy “Junket Is Nice” Is One of the Weirdest Children’s BooksCan a Novel’s Plot Be Reduced to Data Points?How to (Hypothetically) Smuggle a Cheese Ball Through Airport Security Apple's truly smart Siri is coming next spring, report claims Facebook's livestream had one big advantage over everybody else 5 unanswered Nintendo Switch questions you should be asking No, you can't use your self Inside a weird and wonderful costume geek's paradise Bar gives customer the perfect note for leaving their vehicle behind Plastic bottles are bringing light to the poorest parts of world The internet is enamored with George H.W. Bush's 1993 letter to Bill Clinton Despite what this hat says, don't grab women 'by the brain' or otherwise People exploded with joy when the final debate was finally over Welcome to New York, Taylor Swift exhibit. It's been waiting for you. UN urges Bangladesh to scrap coal plant near world's largest mangrove Queen Cersei gives her verdict on the debate with one resounding tweet Local artist gives baby Jesus a clay head, and the results are ... interesting Stressed out after the debates? You're not the only one Jose Bautista will never out Josh Brown's letters admitting to domestic violence are now haunting the NFL Europe's Mars lander is lost on the red planet Josh Norman will mime drinking beer to prove his point about the NFL History's most spectacular Mars mission fails