Amid a churning AI market and classic sex moviesincreasing anxiety about the role of AI in the creation of works of art, the U.S. government has set a strong benchmark: If a human isn't involved, it's not worth legal protections.
Part of a far-reaching report on AI and copyright, the U.S. Copyright Office has interpreted that unedited outputs of generative AI tools don't qualify for federal copyright shelter. The decision comes as part of a years-long AI initiative that set out to answer several outstanding legal questions as the AI boom ramped up, including if the U.S. Constitution's Copyright Clause permits protection for AI-generated material.
"The outputs of generative AI can be protected by copyright only where a human author has determined sufficient expressive elements," writes the office in the report's second installment, issued Jan. 29. "This can include situations where a human-authored work is perceptible in an AI output, or a human makes creative arrangements or modifications of the output, but not the mere provision of prompts."
Works that use generative AI in their creative process or that include AI-generated material areeligible, as they still retain "the centrality of humancreativity" rather than having AI stand-in for human creators, Shira Perlmutter, register of copyrights and director of the U.S. Copyright Office, explained. "Extending protection to material whose expressive elements are determined by a machine, however, would undermine rather than further the constitutional goals of copyright."
That means that images or videos created by tools like Midjourney or OpenAI's DALL-E 3 can't be copyrighted by their individual generators, even if said person wrote a complex, entirely original prompt to generate the content. Prompts alone aren't up for copyright either, and neither are successive iterations on such content.
SEE ALSO: Yes, Popeye can eat spinach: Everything you need to know about Public Domain Day 2025The office's report lays out further guidelines for the "level" of human involvement in creating AI art using assistive technologies, including the use of computer generated images in the filmmaking process. A key factor in the office's decision was the unpredictability of a generative AI output, which can produce different results with the same, or similar prompts.
"Although entering prompts into a generative AI system can be seen as similar to providing instructions to an artist commissioned to create a work, there are key differences. In a human-to-human collaboration, the hiring party is able to oversee, direct, and understand the contributions of a commissioned human artist," the report explains. "The gaps between prompts and resulting outputs demonstrate that the user lacks control over the conversion of their ideas into fixed expression."
A third part of the report, set to release later this year, will elucidate on the role of copyright in training AI models and generative AI tools on original, protected materials.
Topics Artificial Intelligence
Previous:The Banality of Good
Bill Murray will be tending bar in Brooklyn this weekendSweet little princess is terrified of Donald TrumpKind teacher gives students 101 ways to manage their stressMobileye kicks Tesla to the curb for 'pushing the envelope in terms of safety'Alibaba fires 4 employees for hacking system and hoarding mooncakesHere's how Airbnb is trying to convince its hosts to join its fight against New York statePolice cat proves you can fight crime, even if you sleep 16 hours a day'Game of Thrones' sisters Sophie Turner and Maisie Williams got matching tattoosSweet little princess is terrified of Donald TrumpKanye West sees himself as the Will Ferrell in 'Elf' of fashionSubway employee zaps bugs near customers' foodThe 8 dumbest things about last night's 'American Horror Story' premiere'Fifty Shades Darker' trailer proves its force is more awake than 'Star Wars'NASA spacecraft found a surprise within a surpriseIsn't it obvious what happened to iPhone 7 Plus supplies?Donald Trump's visit to a church in Flint was super awkwardGirl in inflatable TMLB star Sean Doolittle perfectly summarizes why white Americans should listen to black activistsWhat is NASA+? Your guide to the streaming serviceThe ad industry is taking a huge step toward including female directors CES 2017: Winners and losers Attention internet: WikiLeaks is now anti Serena Williams used Reddit to show off her engagement ring with her beau The best tech at CES you probably can't afford This phone has a built Prosthesis is a huge, terrifying exoskeleton built for real Yahoo accidentally tweeted a racist slur and Twitter is dragging them An iceberg the size of Delaware is about to break off Antarctica News broadcast about Alexa ordering a dollhouse makes Alexas order dollhouses 'A Monster Calls' featurette knows why you cry so much at the movies 5 Golden Globe wins we'd love to see Who did this to this poor CES booth? Mars by 2026? The 4 key takeaways from Elon Musk's Starship update What to watch in esports: the first big tournaments of 2017 Professional Esports Association suspends its 'CS:GO' league The most excessive tech at Day 3 of CES 2017 Son organises 50 pole dancing girls on jeeps for father's funeral BMW’s HaloActive technology is knock Trivial Pursuit may have gone a bit too hard on the 'find and replace' function Vinci smart headphones have a friggin' screen on them
2.3472s , 10130.484375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【classic sex movies】,Openness Information Network