It looks like Facebook’s actions to stop the spread of fake news might actually be eroticism in art meaningworking.
A new study titled "Trends in the Diffusion of Misinformation on Social Media" from researchers at Stanford University and New York University have discovered that Facebook engagement -- shares, likes, and comments from users interacting with articles on the platform -- dramatically dropped 50 percent between the 2016 election and July 2018.
SEE ALSO: Mark Zuckerberg on election interference: 'This has been an intense year'Researchers Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow, and Chuan Yu used data from over 570 sites classified as fake news from sources such as Poltifact, FactCheck, and Buzzfeed. Using data compiled by BuzzSumo, a marketing analytics firm that tracks “user interactions with internet content on Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms,” the researchers discovered that the Facebook engagement of all the sites combined sat at 70 million as of this July. That’s a huge drop from its height in 2016 when the sites had totaled 200 million monthly engagements.
The study also took into account that this might not just be relative to fake news content. Facebook is always making adjustments to it’s algorithm with effects that echo through the entire site. To make sure the falling Facebook engagement trend is unique to outlets peddling misinformation and not just a result of a platform-wide algorithm change, the study also looked at legitimate news, business, and culture websites. The results were encouraging. “We see no similar pattern for other news, business, or culture sites, where interactions have been relatively stable over time and have followed similar trends [...] before and after the election.”
While Facebook is headed in the direction when it comes to combating misinformation, unfortunately, the same can’t be said about Twitter. The same study discovered that engagement on Twitter, such as retweets, has actually gone up when it comes to fake news -- from 4 million engagements in 2016 to 6 million in 2018.
Mark Zuckerberg and company may be on the right track when it comes to fighting fake news, but as you can see from those engagement numbers, it’s not a success story quite yet. Even with the downward trend over the past 2 years, Facebook is still responsible for much more of the spread of fake news than a social platform like Twitter. The company may have a much larger user base than the little blue bird, which certainly accounts for the higher engagement numbers, but it also has many more resources. Along with technology to fight fake news, Facebook has been able to recruit human beings to moderate and monitor the site for misinformation whereas Twitter has made it clear via it’s CEO Jack Dorsey that they don’t want to partake in being "arbiters of truth." Twitter also likely can’t afford to either.
There isn’t yet cause for celebration, as there’s still much more work to be done in the battle against fake news. The researchers of this study are also open with the fact that additional research is needed even on its findings. However, the study does enforce that these first steps taken by Facebook to curb fake news are indeed having some affect.
Topics Facebook X/Twitter Politics
On Uwe Johnson: The Hardest Book I’ve Ever Translated by Damion SearlsPoetry Rx: You Have Become Everything You Needed To Become by Claire SchwartzRethinking Schiele by Cody DelistratyRedux: You Only Vote Once in a While by The Paris ReviewThe Labyrinth of Saul Steinberg by Harold RosenbergHayao Miyazaki’s Cursed WorldsStaff Picks: Shirkers, Sculptors, and Space Ghosts by The Paris ReviewA True Utopia: An Interview With N. K. Jemisin by Abigail BereolaEdward Gorey Lived at the Ballet by Mark DeryThe Epistolary Friendship of Guy Davenport and Hugh KennerCooking with Georges Bataille by Valerie StiversRedux: You Only Vote Once in a While by The Paris ReviewPoetry Rx: When You Weep, Sorrow Comes Clean Out by Kaveh AkbarCooking with Octavia Butler by Valerie StiversA History of the Novel in Two Hundred EssaysLeonard Michaels Was a Cat Person by Sigrid NunezThe Shocking, Subversive Endings of Taeko Kōno’s Stories by Gabe HabashOn Uwe Johnson: The Hardest Book I’ve Ever Translated by Damion SearlsThe Faces of Ferrante by Miranda PopkeyLaurie Anderson on Ingrid Sischy Starbucks is trialling a 5p charge on disposable coffee cups in London Solana blockchain overrun with racist memecoins in latest cryptocurrency trend TikTok takes on U.S. Senators and billionaires as ban looms Vulnerability found in Apple's Silicon M Elon Musk replies to Donald Trump's SpaceX Falcon Heavy tweet Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster will overshoot Mars Best Amazon Big Spring Sale scanner deals: ScanSnap, Epson, and more Baylor vs. Clemson basketball livestreams: How to watch live Elon Musk shows off the dummy that's going to Mars in a Tesla Australia's Climate Council launches chatbot to school you on climate NYT's The Mini crossword answers for March 24 Google quietly testing its AI search results among general users Two Falcon Heavy SpaceX rocket boosters land back on Earth The $30 million Google Lunar XPrize will go unclaimed Bill Nye is attending the State of the Union, and people aren't happy Best Amazon Spring Sale 2024 printer deals: Get an HP all RIP Nigel, the saddest bird in the world Best Samsung tablet deals: Shop the Big Spring Sale NYT's The Mini crossword answers for March 23 What it was like to watch SpaceX's first Falcon Heavy launch in person
1.8437s , 8287.90625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【eroticism in art meaning】,Openness Information Network